Newspaper reporter’s two-year sentence deals severe blow to press freedom

first_img Receive email alerts VietnamAsia – Pacific Recommendations:1. To the Vietnamese government: Drop the charges against Nguyen Viet Chien and Nguyen Van Hai and release them immediately. Cancel the sanctions taken against the journalist who publicly supported them. April 22, 2021 Find out more RSF_en 2. To the World Bank: Make the granting of new loans conditional on the release of the two journalists and the end of media control. Organisation 14.10 – Prosecutor calls for prison sentences against journalists who exposed corruption April 27, 2021 Find out more Follow the news on Vietnam Reporters Without Borders today condemned a call by the prosecutor, on the first day of a trial at the Hanoi people’s court, for prison sentences to be passed against prominent journalists Nguyen Van Hai and Nguyen Viet Chien who exposed a major corruption scandal.The prosecutor called for a suspended sentence of 18-24 months re-education against Nguyen Van Hai, of the newspaper Tuoi Tre, who pleaded guilty, and 24-30 months in jail for Nguyen Viet Chien of the daily Thanh Nien.The Vietnamese state charged both of them with publishing inaccurate reports about the 2005 PMU 18 scandal, implicating scores of transport ministry officials for embezzling funds earmarked for development projects to make sporting bets, based on information from two police officers, Pham Xuan Quac and Dinh Van Huynh.Nguyen Van Hai admitted to the court that he had made mistakes in some of his articles and burst into tears in the dock. Nguyen Viet Chien took a more combative stance, saying he was a principled journalist whose sole aim was to fight corruption.”As soon as the police give us a piece of information, it is no longer secret”, he replied to a representative of the prosecutor’s office who accused him of revealing state secrets.One of the prosecutors said that all information from police sources was illegal because the Vietnamese press law bans media from using unauthorised sources. “Hostile forces, reactionaries and political opportunists” have taken advantage of this scandal to attack Vietnamese leaders, one of the prosecutors, quoted by Agence France-Presse, said.Foreign media and diplomats who applied to follow the trial were only able to watch proceedings via a closed circuit television set up in a hall adjacent to the court.Reporters Without Borders hailed the reaction of scores of Vietnamese journalists who gathered outside the court to support their colleagues. VietnamAsia – Pacific RSF laureates support jailed Vietnamese journalist Pham Doan Trang 3. To democratic governments, particularly the European Union: Make financial backing for Vietnam conditional on the outcome of this case and also on reduced control of the media. April 7, 2021 Find out morecenter_img News Reporters Without Borders condemns the two-year prison sentence which a Hanoi people court’s passed today on journalist Nguyen Viet Chien of the Thanh Nien daily newspaper for his coverage of a major corruption scandal in 2006. Another journalist employed by a liberal newspaper who pleaded guilty received a non-custodial sentence. “What is at stake in the court is more important than the trial of two innocent journalists, it is a public trial that is aimed at frightening the entire profession”, said one colleague of the two journalists, who asked for anonymity, as did most of those questioned.”We are watching this trial very closely because it is a test for the country” one European diplomat said. “No-body dares to talk about this famous corruption case any more in the Vietnamese press (…) This trial is not just of two individuals but of the whole profession”, said Bui Tin, a veteran of the official press now living in France.”There are a lot of comments being posted on discussion forums, but there is also a lot of fear. Everyone knows that this case is a step backwards” said one Vietnamese journalist.Nguyen Van Hai of Tuoi Tre (Youth) and Nguyen Viet Chien, aged 56, of Thanh Nien (The Young) were involved since 2005 in investigating the PMU 18 scandal implicating scores of officials in the transport ministry who were embezzling funds earmarked for development projects to make sporting bets. The vice minister was arrested initially, but was acquitted.Police arrested the two journalists at their newspaper offices on 12 May 2008. The arresting officers said the two journalists had published false information about the PMU 18 scandal. Both had their offices and homes searched.In the aftermath of these arrests, police questioned a large number of journalists including senior staff on the papers. The daily Tuoi Tre, highly regarded for its outspokenness, was the main target of this crackdown. “The paper has lost its combative approach. The readers are beginning to desert Tuoi Tre”, said one journalist in Ho Chi Minh-City.Colleagues who publicly backed the two arrested journalists also came in for punishment. The Information and Communications Ministry on 1st August withdrew press cards from seven journalists, including Tuoi Tre, deputy editor, Bui Van Thanh and bureau chief in Hanoi, Duong Duc Da Trang and deputy editor Nguyen Quoc Phong and sub-editor Huynh Kim Sanh, on Thanh Nien.The highly respected Bui Van Thanh said: “Justice has been scorned. Journalists have become the victims in this case.”Shortly before this, there was a reshuffle of top editorial posts on the website VietnamNet that was seen by several observers as a clean-up by the information ministry. The replacement for editor Nguyen Anh Tuan, a journalist who was trained in the United States, will be tasked with gagging the website often seen as an open media.These sanctions have caused alarm among the leaders of Vietnam’s journalists’ organisations. The day after the arrests, the chairman of the Vietnamese Journalists’ Association said, “The press plays a crucial part in the struggle against corruption. It is the role of journalists to seek out information. Now that the case is clearly out in the public domain, it is not the time to look at the responsibility of journalists.” For her part, the chairwoman of the Ho Chi Minh-City Journalists’ Association said she was shocked and saddened by the arrest of her colleagues, adding, “I think these journalists have been very courageous investigating the PMU 18 scandal”. This case has also prompted a strong public outcry. The day of their arrest we had two thousand comments on an article about it.Since May, foreign observers have noticed a toning down of editorial lines. “After three days of open criticism in this case, the press went quiet. And we are now seeing a progressive loss of editorial independence. Even on the economy, the newspaper are full of editorials on the theme, “All is well”. On politics, the tougher line is even more obvious,” said one foreign correspondent posted in Hanoi.The authorities’ hounding of Tuoi Tre and Thanh Nien is also seen as a blow against the fight against corruption. Veteran journalist Thai Duy said, “We all agree that the fight against corruption in our country is a matter of life or death.””Should these two journalists be arrested, while no-one has really got any results in this struggle? The press is the most effective instrument in this fight. If the press is reined in, what will become of it?”One diplomat in Hanoi said, “The two reporters worked on reports on embezzlement of money intended for development. How can the government then proceed in its fight against corruption? That is what we said during a meeting on the fight against corruption in Hanoi in June. But we have not so far had any reaction.”The trial has also attracted hostile statements towards the media from the highest authorities. Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung said that he was opposed to private individuals having press rights. “A large number of young journalists reacted to this statement with disappointment and bitterness, seeing it as a bucket of cold water thrown on their hopes, when they had come to believe in a revival in the profession”, said Bui Tin. He said that the crackdown had been ordered by the political bureau of the Vietnamese Communist Party. to go further News October 15, 2008 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Newspaper reporter’s two-year sentence deals severe blow to press freedom Help by sharing this information Vietnam sentences journalist Tran Thi Tuyet Dieu to eight years in prison 10.10 – Trial of two journalists will be test for press freedom and the fight against corruption Reporters Without Borders today called on the Vietnamese judges due to try journalists Nguyen Viet Chien and Nguyen Van Hai starting on 14 October to dismiss the case and release them.The trial will be a crucial test for press freedom and the struggle against corruption in Vietnam because the two investigative journalists reported on the huge PMU 18 corruption scandal within the transport ministry that tarnished top officials.Since the arrests, the authorities have tightened their control on the liberal press and have punished journalists who expressed public support for their colleagues.”By putting Nguyen Viet Chien and Nguyen Van Hai on trial, the authorities have chosen to revenge themselves on daring journalists who revealed embarrassing cases and brought greater freedom to the Vietnamese press.”While some corrupt officials have benefited from a certain leniency, journalists are now being put in the dock. It is an insult to justice. The trial is at the epicentre of an earthquake that has destroyed the still fragile basis of a more independent press, wanting to play its role of challenging established authority,” the worldwide press freedom organisation said.Reporters Without Borders has obtained testimony from journalists, diplomats and press freedom activists who fear the trial will have a very damaging effect on the freedom of the press but also on the country’s good governance. Initially accused of misuse of power in their work, the two journalists are now facing seven years in jail for “misuse of democratic rights to harm the interests of the state, organisations and citizens.”Lawyer for one of the journalists criticised the switch in the charges which was made without any explanation. The trial is set to open on 14 October before a people’s court in Hanoi.On trial alongside them will be two police officers, including Gen. Pham Xuan Quac, accused of providing them with information. They are accused of having “deliberately revealed state secrets”. Reporters Without Borders condemns the two-year prison sentence which a Hanoi people court’s passed today on journalist Nguyen Viet Chien of the Thanh Nien daily newspaper for his coverage of a major corruption scandal in 2006. Another journalist employed by a liberal newspaper who pleaded guilty received a non-custodial sentence.”The outcome of this trial is a terrible step backwards for investigative journalism in Vietnam,” Reporters Without Borders said. “The fragile basis of a press capable of playing its role of challenging established authority has been badly shaken.”The organisation added: “We urge the Vietnamese authorities to quickly grant Chien an early release and we call on the international community, especially the European Union, to condition aid to Vietnam more closely on respect for press freedom and the release of imprisoned journalists.”At the end of a two-day trial, Chien was found guilty of “abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the state.” Before passing sentence, presiding judge Tran Van Vy said he had published fabricated information that “damaged the prestige of certain high-ranking officers, inciting the population to have a negative opinion of high levels of government.”Chien pleaded not guilty, insisting that: “The information used in my press articles was provided by police officials.”The other journalist, Nguyen Van Hai, who pleaded guilty to the same charges and said he make mistakes in some of his articles, was given a non-custodial sentence of two years of reeducation. The presiding judge said he got a lighter sentence because of his “active cooperation with investigators and his remorse.” Hai burst into tears in court during the first day of the trial.Two senior police officers who had investigated the corruption case were convicted of “deliberately revealing secret information.” One, Gen. Pham Xuan Quac, who had resigned from the police, was given a warning. The other, Dinh Van Huynh, received a one-year prison sentence. News Three more independent reporters arrested in Vietnam Newslast_img read more

Read More →

Council says no to downtown master plan

first_img By Federico Martinez – April 28, 2021 Council says no to downtown master plan Twitter WhatsApp Twitter GovernmentCity of OdessaLocal News What seemed to be a routine piece of business turned into a bit of confusion during Tuesday’s Odessa City Council meeting.Councilwoman Denise Swanner changed her initial raised hand from a yes to a no on the issue of hiring Kimley Horn to oversee the city’s Downtown Master Plan update.Swanner initially raised her hand in favor of hiring the master plan firm, along with council members Detra White, Mari Willis and Steve Thompson. But when Mayor Javier Joven called for a show of those opposed to the motion, he noticed Swanner did not raise her hand.“Mrs. Swanner?” Joven asked, while he and councilmembers Mark Matta and Tom Sprawls’ hands were still raised in opposition to the measure.After noticing the vote, Swanner raised her hand a second time, this time voting in opposition.“Nay, I vote nay,” Swanner said as she raised her hand the second time. “I vote nay.”Willis and White briefly argued that Swanner had already cast a vote, but Joven quickly declared the motion had been defeated.Following the meeting Thompson accused Joven of “prompting” Swanner to change her vote.“Swanner clearly voted twice and the mayor has allowed her to do that at least three times before,” Thompson said. “Swanner changed her vote after the mayor prompted her.”Following Tuesday’s meeting, City Attorney Natasha Brooks said it was OK for Swanner to change her vote.At Joven’s request, Brooks also ruled during the meeting that Councilman Tom Sprawls, who voted against the hiring of Kimley Horn, could not make a new motion because council had already voted.“I voted against it, but I see no reason not to move forward with it,” said Sprawls, who explained he only wanted more information before voting in favor of it.When Sprawls attempted to make a motion to instead table the issue, Brooks informed him it was too late.Brooks told Sprawls he couldn’t make a motion to table the issue because council had already voted.Brooks agreed with Joven’s assessment that the issue would have to go back to a city committee, be reviewed and a new recommendation to bring it back for council for reconsideration would be required.Maryland artist Jim Sanborn’s work will memorialize the victims of the Aug. 31, 2019 mass shooting in Odessa. The memorial is to be placed at the corner of JBS Parkway and 42nd Street. (Courtesy Photo)In other action, council unanimously approved a proposal to place a $300,000, 10-foot circular art piece that will pay tribute to victims of a 2019 Odessa mass shooting on the University of Texas Permian Basin campus through 2051.City officials initially were looking at placing the memorial at Memorial Gardens, but changed their minds after a study concluded it would cost $700,000 to retrofit Memorial Gardens.Under their agreement with UTPB, the city will maintain ownership of the memorial even if it is someday relocated.Under the agreement, UTPB will construct a plaza at the corner of JBS Parkway and 42nd Street, where the memorial will be placed.The memorial will include the names of all seven victims, and engraved quotes from their family members.Council on Tuesday also unanimously approved the purchase of more than $600,000 in new technology and furnishings for the police department’s new training facility.The purchase includes cutting edge virtual training technology that will “enhance crisis intervention and de-escalation training for officers,” Police Chief Mike Gerke previously said during last week’s work session.The cost of the new system is $326,471.42 and will be paid out of the police department’s capital outlay-buildings fund, Gerke said. The total cost includes shipping, installation of the tactical simulators and a 5-year service support agreement.An additional $142,354.30 is expected to be used to purchase more than a dozen laptops, docking stations, and 29 large, interactive TV monitors and various accessories.Council approved the police department’s request to spend another $141,221.31 on new furniture for the facility, including various tables, desks, and chairs.The new training facility will be located in the former Central Fire Station, which is being renovated, Gerke said. It’s located behind the police department.The department currently conducts its training operations in the basement of the police department, Gerke said.“To be honest, it’s kind of embarrassing,” Gerke said. “We wanted this new facility to be state-of-the-art; something we could use to impress potential new recruits and use as a regional training facility.”The new facility will be operating by July, Gerke said.Council also approved a $30,000 art sculpture design, that when completed will be placed outdoors in the facility’s front entrance.The 10-foot-tall sculpture, which will weigh 4,000 lbs., portrays an abstract scene of a parent and child standing in front of a law enforcement officer, said Randy Ham, executive director of Odessa Arts. The project will be paid with capital outlay funds.San Antonio artist Oscar Alvarado, was one of more than 40 artists who bid on the project, Ham said. WhatsAppcenter_img Facebook Pinterest Pinterest TAGSDenise SwannerDowntown Master PlanJavier Jovenmass shooting memorialMike GerkeOdessa City Councilpolice departmentTom Sprawlstraining facility Facebook Previous articleNTO grads value their experienceNext articleDAILY OIL PRICE: April 28, 2021 Federico Martinezlast_img read more

Read More →